Warzone 1080p vs 1440p reddit. 1080p is very ugly on 27 inch. SKILL Trident Z Royal - 16GB (2 x 8GB) 3600MHz CL14. Should I pick that over high settings high fps 1080p? I like story based games and good graphics, might play some competitive fps games but just for fun. I currently run the same with a 1440p 144hz monitor. GPU: XFX RX 5700 XT THICC III ULTRA 8GB. Its not that bad in games or movies though. 4K is the native resolution for PS5. $150 Dell G2724D Gaming Monitor - Fast IPS Panel, 1440p, 144hz, 1ms, AMD FreeSync Premium, HDR400. And thats 3 times for each of the 10 GPU's for an average. For some slow games like Anno 1800 I'd prefer 1440p 75hz, for shooters 1080p 165hz. You need to set it in windows or drivers manually the first time, you'll see immediately what difference 165hz makes especially when you have both monitors side by side. 3 Best 1080p 240Hz Gaming Monitor – Samsung 27-Inch CRG5. A 1080ti is starting to struggle at 1440p, all it takes is one benchmark video to see that the 3060 struggles. A 1080ti does not struggle at 1440p which I’ve used for years so a 3060 sure as hell does not. 1440@60 at at least 20mb/s quality (better higher). I have a 32" 1440p (AOC Q3277PQU) and a 27" 1440p (LG 27GL850). Going from 1080 to 1440 is definitely an improvement with the same graphic settings and similar I have a 1440p 165hz on my desktop and a 240hz 1080p on my laptop. 5800X3D is currently the best gaming CPU out there. The exception being some games where the 4060ti will have VRAM issues (stuttering, missing textures, crashing, other) especially at 1440p, it's not most games and can be remedied by using lower settings. Call of Duty: Warzone is a first-person shooter video game series developed by Infinity Ward and Raven Software, and published by Activision. The 4K is about 63% greater than 1080p. 1 enabled monitors. 1080p is starting to show its age, even on 15" screens not to mention gaming at 1080p barely stresses the 30 series gpus. That said, some rendering tasks like raw geometry or classic anti-aliasing techniques are a linear resolution to performance hit but modern anti-aliasing is far more efficient and raw geometry rendering takes very little time so the increase there has very On older games it should manage 1440p fine, just don't expect locked 60 fps on the latest titles, even on minimum settings. so dlss in nutshell, it lowers the resolution and upscales it to boost performance while native output actual resolution. 33 of a pixel. 77x more pixels than 1080p) I don't get an expected decrease in performance, I actually get a slight uplift across the board. At 23" a 1080p display has around 96ppi and this was the pixel density target number that most OS UI and UX has been designed around. Conversely, you could use dldsr to get a 4K like image on a 1440p monitor, though it works better in some games than others and is 3-7% more demanding than native 4K. Well it depends on what you're after. 24 inch 1080p is 92 ppi or pixels per inch. Some high quality 1080p monitor will always look better than budget 1440p. Most actually run at 1080 or 1440p and are upscaled to 4k. Hz and respond time are more important than resolution… 1440 is definitely worth it. 32" is too big (even 1m away from the screen) and it's when you see 1440p, you won’t want to see 1080p anymore. Yes. RAM: 32GB Corsair Vengeance PRO 3600mhz. Which is why i buy a 1440p monitor. I would never even consider 1080p if someone has a GPU better than RTX 2000's. 1440p IPS is king144hz makes a huge difference vs 60hzIt's hard to not go with curved on anything 30" and above. Because youtube compress all files, and their algorythm is not sparing. Not best for fast paced gaming but usually can be found on good sales. However the base resolution here can At this point 1440p is the sweet spot. I play on a 2560x1440 Monitor that has a refresh rate of 165hz. Not as sharp and defined as 4K, but still looks way better than 1080p. 3080 Ti can do it no problem for a lot of games. Can be, depends how much lower and what you're doing. My monitor only supports HDMI 2. I'm fine with getting lower frames Wait for it to find one, fill up and start. Display: 3440 x 1440 (144hz) GPU: 3080 MSI Gaming Trio X. You went from 24in-27in which is about 20% increase. The higher the quality your initial file is, the better would be finished YT output. Sharpness, picture quality and additional area is nice. If you want more screen real estate then a 32: 1440p monitor will "feel" like an upgrade. Just curious if this is will be the case with SF6. Other things will probably make more of a difference to your experience, like OLED, 120hz I came from iPhones though and the effective PPI & subpixel resolution at 1080p is quite a bit lower than iPhone 4-8: S10+ @ 1080p. 1440p is also doable on your setup but you will suffer from lower frames and lower settings. At 27" 1440p is only about 14% greater pixel density over a typical 23" 1080p display. Gigabyte G27Q, a 1440p IPS monitor, is cheaper than a lot of 1440p VA monitors and has a pretty good review . true. r/CODWarzone is a developer-recognized community focused on the series. I am fine with a 1080p laptop as long as the GPU is beefy enough to do 1440 when you plug in a screen. ago. The reason being is because the FPS change. 3 1440p 144Hz vs 1080p 240Hz. . Worked great for me. 7ghz all core) - - cooled by an NZXT Z63. I know some other genres like shooters, most pros prefer 1080p or 1440p over 4k. My main rig has a RTX3070 Ti. Especially on 15 inch models u wont notice much difference. » AOC C24G1 - VA, but a good budget option. Or check it out in the app stores 1080p or 1440p for warzone? Build Help hey, i have a ryzen 5 3600 I'd definitely go 1440p with a 1080ti: 27gl850 or 27gl83a or Lenovo y27q-20 (all use the same panel), Aorus fi27q, pixio px7, viewsonic VX2758-2KP-MHD, Asus VG27AQ, Asus xg279q, BenQ EX2780Q, Asus PG279Q. Can't do 4k 120 HDR due to Xbox limitations unless the 2. So yes, 1440p is a big upgrade from 1080 and a 6800 will do just fine as I used to run 1440 on a 6700 non xt. Difference between 1080 at 10mb/s and 1440 at 10mb/s is like night and day already, and now imagine going higher. So I currently game on a 27 inch 1440 144hz g sync monitor but I’ve recently gotten into more competitive gaming and wanted to go to 1080p. The difference between 1440p to 4k on a 27-inch display is not nearly as much of a noticeable jump compared from 1080p to 1440p. However if your actual choices are 120hz 1080p or 60hz 1440p monitors then for sure go 1080p 120hz. 525ppi - 350ppi (RGB equiv) - 1050 subpixels per inch. 1440p looks so much better for everything outside of esports, and actually puts modern gpus to work. I exclusively play warzone and want the most frames possible. I'd rather spend a little more and future proof rather than have to buy a whole new monitor when it's not enough. That said, some rendering tasks like raw geometry or classic anti-aliasing techniques are a linear resolution to performance hit but modern anti-aliasing is far more efficient and raw geometry rendering takes very little time so the increase there has very The RX6700 is a 1080p/1440p beast and probably the best VFM right now. 1440p on a 27” monitor is as good as 4K on the same size monitor, the pixel density on a 27” is almost indistinguishable between those two resolutions. 27 inch 1440p is 108 ppi. » ViewSonic XG2405 – 1080p 144hz IPS, good alternative to the Acer Nitro. Your visual quality will definitely take a huge jump when you go from 1080 to 1440p. The primary problem with buying an RTX 4090 for 1440p gaming is the fact modern xx80 and xx90 cars have more performance value at higher resolutions (2160p and higher). Only if you are 100% set on competitive side - get 360hz. I would highly recommend this for 1080p players, as this will give you the benefit of a sharper image, while also improving frame rates. PLEASE consider a different brand. 1080p. 1440p experience is like cheating against 1080p players. PSU: Corsair HX850. 1920x1080 = 2073600 pixels. Like others have said, it depends on the game and the settings. Valorant actually has a “CPU+GPU” processing tracker that confirmed my results. Reply reply. Welcome to r/gaminglaptops, the hub for gaming laptop enthusiasts. Right now you're in the sweet spot of PC gaming. That makes 1440p 177% of 1080p. I can confirm 120hz is possible. So, basically if you see a 24 inch 1080p screen, then that's the level of sharpness that you'll get with a 32 inch 1440p screen. The 3060Ti is way faster dude. But that would be at maxed settings with maxed FOV and on unoptimized games. 1. no gpu is capable of 240 fps at 1440p on any relatively recent game. I sit a lot of hours in front of a screen if that might help. 4K would be better suited for 32” and 1080p is better suited for 23-24” but it also depends on far/close you are sitting to the monitor. And obviously a 27 inch 1440p display is extremely sharp. The Aliasing is there but it’s not quite as noticeable as it would be with a 32” 1440p screen. Until the 7000 3D vcash is dropped. 4:58 - 1440P Low Settings. I’m just making the following post to share my appreciation and to say that I’m so impressed with the RX 6700. Resolutions matters more for a secondary display than anything else, unless you have specific requirements and use cases for it, of course. Recently tried playing on rtx 2060 1080p 144hz monitor and while getting around 70-80 fps, the image lagged and i just quit. You will notice a better fidelity and texture clarity with 1440p at 27. Plus 1080p on a 1440p monitor looks even worse than just a normal 1080p monitor. I would rather play at 1440p/100fps than 1080p/144fps. most 1440p monitor aren’t 240hz and if they are they’re insanely priced, so they stick with what they have 1080p 240hz monitor, plus at lans all monitors are 1080p. I paid 499 Canadian for this one. did the 150% render resolution with dlss on and the game is extra crisp now. but if you’re playing on a tv stop. Hey there. Neither will 3090/Ti. 1440p has only slightly more resolution than 1080p, so you’ll probably not notice much of an improvement. It was +3ms for 1440p and +7ms for 4k in comparison to 1080p. That said, some rendering tasks like raw geometry or classic anti-aliasing techniques are a linear resolution to performance hit but modern anti-aliasing is far more efficient and raw geometry rendering takes very little time so the increase there has very little overall impact. I don't really know why they use 1080p instead of 1440p isnt there some advantages if they play with 1440p 144hz is the sweet spot, got an m27q which is 1440p 170hz, nice boost over 144 and awesome ips image quality. Would rather go 75hz 1440p or if you can save a bit more and not regret it a 1440p 144hz and instead of a 1660ti a rx 5600 xt (that card is stronger for the same price and after driver updates will get even beter. Basically zero games run at actual 4k on the ps5 anyway. In many cases a 3070 is not enough for 1080p 144fps, much less 1440p 144fps. Unless you pretty much do competitive shooters exclusively get the 144hz 1440p. Frisho. Will an upgrade be worth it? If you’re going 1440p, I’d suggest 27”. If you’d gone up to a 27” but stayed at 1080 it would look like crap. 240hz is more smooth, for sure, but the difference is not as big as 60hz-165hz. The wattage it's pulling is only around 170-190 with is *HALF* of it's TDP %. Good answer. 2GHz. I have a 1080p 240hz atm and mainly play cs/lol, more warzone lately and occasional singleplayer games. Apr 12, 2021 · 2 Resolution & Response Time. . How people feel about upgrading to 27" 1440p doesn't really change that fact. I rather prefer native over a few fps even dlss quality isn't that great sure it produces sharpness and details but its artificially generated and isn't always accurate. Same goes for your PC itself lower fps or lower graphical preset 1440p looks again worse. You should still notice a difference tho. 1440p is a significant fidelity increase over 1080p at "standard" monitor sizes. The PS5 will run with no problem on it and you can set it to refresh 120hz. 1080p ultra wise, it seems it can handle 120+fps, without any changes. I play Apex Legends and other FPS games very competitively, and I’d like to know which of the two is a better option? One is a 1080p display, while the other is a 1440p display. The XV240Y OC's to 165hz. Get a gaming monitor. What are your thoughts? So a 3070 will be fine. 32 1440p monitor has 94 ppi same as 24 1080p monitor. Pixel density will still be better than 24” at 1080p, but not high enough to really slow down your FPS. 5 1440 144Hz & 1080p 240Hz Recommendations. Very much depends on your budget and what exactly you plan to get. Go 240hz with a 27”. 5-8% gain tops. Discover discussions, news, reviews, and advice on finding the perfect gaming laptop. The reddit PC enthusiast crowd warps our minds to think that a 3080 is the bare minimum that a gamer needs for great performance, and that's just absurd. 1080p for warzone. You may even feel like the mouse on your 75hz monitor is laggy. 27 inch 1440p most optimum desktop experience. Dell G2723H Gaming Monitor - IPS Panel, 1080p, 280hz, 1ms, AMD FreeSync Premium. Get a 4K mate. Join our passionate community to stay informed and connected with the latest trends and technologies in the gaming laptop world. Wait for it to find one, fill up and start. Also, i once tried 240hz and i did notice quite a big jump over 144hz 1080p It's either 1440 or 1080 with 120 or 4k 60 HDR. 3060 ti and 3060 are quite different in performance. Have a Samsung G7 27", I plan on going with the 6900XT. For those who is thinking between 1080p, 1440p, or 4k, here's my thoughts as someone's who's owned and used all three extensively The jump from 1080 to 1440 doesnt matter in most games, for example i played csgo at 1280x960 despite having a 1080p monitor, but in a game like warzone where visibility and seeing thinks super far away is essential. Proc: Ryzen 5800x (I have it running at 4. Cyberpunk, Assassins Creed Valhalla, RDR2 and Flight Sim hit GPUS HARD. If i go for 1440p monitor but playing on 1080p resolution, it l look worse that 1080p native, i think. 1440p is pretty much ideal. CPU Cooler: Wraith Prism RGB. 1080p doesnt look nice on a 27inch monitor in my opinion. That being said if you're going to upgrade your laptop to a 50 series (if they're good) then it should manage 1440p with not much compromise. My build can support 1440 don’t get me wrong. Get the monitor when you actually upgrade the GPU, and then get a 1440P IPS monitor, which really aren't that much more than VA monitors. I have a 1440p 165hz on my desktop and a 240hz 1080p on my laptop. S10+ @ 1440p. 1080p is just shit by today's standards, and if you have a better monitor as the main one, you'll never be able to un-see how awful 1080p looks next to it. I tested at the same fps and on separate 1440p and 1080p monitors to avoid any additional lag added by non native render res. 240hz 1440p is even better for future proofing. $224 Hello im trying to decide between dell's newest 1080p 280hz (G2524H IPS) and 1440p 165hz (27GR75Q-B IPS HDR and Dell S2722DGM VA) I mostly play warzone, csgo and also some single player once every few months. Furthermore, a 1440p 144hz monitor is the more "futureproof" purchase and will last you a lot longer than the 1080p monitor in terms of specs. Did some research about 7 months ago on a new mid-range panel i wanted to grab for gaming (i also work on this pc). 1440p is much more enjoyable but solely gaming is fine on 1080p (on the laptop screen not on anything bigger) If you're coming onto the Razer Subreddit you've surely seen the posts of the battery bloat issues. A 27" 1440p screen comes out to about 109ppi so the 4K has about a 44% increase. This will hugely depend on the game, and on the framerate. Only the difference in screen real estate is huge. Try setting your render resolution to 1440p and put DLSS on quality. 1 Best Enthusiast 1440p 144Hz Gaming Monitor – Asus ROG Strix XG279Q. 32 inch is a bit big for desktop but 32 inch 4k could be next sweet spot. 1440p - even CP2077 is 60fps at RTX Ultra with DLSS Performance. If you're playing FPS, then higher frame rate is certainly better. On the other hand, when you upgrade to the higher level, the 1440p resolution, you’ll have 2560x1440p, which equals 3,686,400 pixels. The games you play the most literally decide which monitor to go with. Mobo: NZXT B550. Not to mention the added CPU testing. Yes It only is nice to have if u alrdy use a 1440p monitor so u dont have issues. Additionally, the clarity that 1440p brings to battle royale games like Warzone is a big advantage, imo. Also, if you’re sold on 32inch, LG 32GP850-b is a 1440p 32 inch display for around $400 or less. Even though my 1080 screen is 60hz I compared it to my 1440 155hz screen and it's definitely a big difference. 13 votes, 26 comments. In terms of performance is there a big differences between 1080p and 1440p? I play Pubg and the graphics look pretty pixeld and hard to spot players in the distance imo, and i was thinking to try a 27' 1440p screen. 32" is better for working, movies, more "chill" or strategy games (like civilization, anno 1800, wargame, Total War. 1440p is relatively easy to run period, and with DLSS even more so. Definitely 27" 1440p TN. It wouldn't feel much like an upgrade to go from 24" 1080p to 32" 1440p with the same pixel density, it would just a bigger screen. If you have/want to keep the 4060ti then get a 1080p monitor, maybe a smaller one since 1080p For me, resolution is a game of diminishing returns. Was just curious if u guys think the upgrade to 1440p is Big difference on daily use, smaller difference in gaming. You're better off waiting for 4080 if that's your target. For VRR to work regardless if it is a TV or monitor. Probably around 25-50%. ) However 27" is faaar better for FPS and all very fast games. IMO under 30" is fine for 1080p gaming, but due to pixel density affecting image clarity, 1440p needs more than 30". Bright SDR and contrast picks up 120 Hz fine even tho it can do 144 or 165. Im more into racing and sports games, sometime FPS 1080p 120hz definitely. I think pros will prefer 120fps first and foremost. As others have mentioned, while a lot of games will run well at 1440p on a 3060 most won't, and OP's son won't really have the option of lowering the in game resolution to 1080p without the image looking awful on his 1440p monitor. If you have a 24inch screen then stick to 1080 27 inch is better with 2k. 0 so I don't have the VRR option available as an option. Honestly, it depends what you want to do. It’s depends on your preference, and the game you play. I was thinking of switching to a 1440p monitor but i would be "downgrading" to a 165hz one and my main game being cs (playing on 4:3) i'm not sure about it. 2560x1440 = 3686400 pixels. Had no pleasure. Mine is 27 inch. The "standard" 1080p monitor is usually 24", and the "standard" 1440p is usualy 27" (though there have been 24" and 25" - i have both, plugged into my Mac - they arent as common and can actually be MORE expensive than 27" panels). IPS panels. Regardless of not being able to push a full 240hz in every game its still going to be in the 120fps+ range which is still a good experience. 27 1440p monitor has 109 ppi ~. Actually there 50% price difference here in Egypt. Its def an upgrade in graphics. Tbh unless you're really into competitive fps games or other competitive games that actually have an advantage using really high refresh rates, going 240 or 360hz isn't worth the drop in image quality. 1440 60hz😍😍😍. 32 1080p monitor has 82 ppi ~. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Please feel free to make some recommendations of your own as well! Gigabyte Aorus FI27Q 27” 165hz 1440p Or Alienware AW2521HFL 24” 240hz 1080p SauronOfRings • 50 min. Question. They have to support HDMI 2. 1. ) I'll go for the 1440p 144hz then. SYSTEM SPECS. If you are using the panel for editing or graphics, then a higher resolution would be ideal. As a result, it’s pretty logical that you’ll be getting a much better image when you go with the second option. 3:20 - 1440P High Settings. •. » Asus TUF VG259QM - 25" and 280hz so it's perfect for competitive gaming. 2 Best All-Rounder 1440p 144Hz Gaming Monitor – BenQ EX2780Q. I have an i5 12400f with RTX 3060 12gb vram and 32gb DDR5, I'm getting a monitor for that build and from what I've read my build can easily get over 60 fps in 1440p on most games medium settings. Award. Reply. 1:41 - 1080P Low Settings. 1440p is exactly 1. Conclusions (as TL;DR): VA = not worth it (neither is TN). 5. It definitely does not. Otherwise, 1440p 240hz is lot easier to achieve and gives a good balance of perfomance and visuals. Getting ~95fps at 1440p on a ryzen 2600 Obvious-Arachnid-398. 1080p 240hz vs 1440p 165hz. At 3 different resolutions and then repeating all that for each ress and GPU at lower settings. 1440p 120hz. I'm currently playing Warzone on an Xbox Series X with a 1080p/144hz monitor and continue to contemplate if I should upgrade to a 1440p monitor. It supports 1440p as a native output resolution now as well. If you go for 1440p, downscaling to 720p is the best option because 1440p is exactly 2x more pixels than 720p, which will give you a more consistently clear image. 1440p vs 1080p. A 24" 1080p screen has the same pixel density as a 32 inch 1440p screen. Funnily enough, I get ~105 fps on 1440p, only a 5 fps decrease from 1080p. Yet, since I plan to build new PC with rtx 3080 - 24" 1080p monitor feels like a waste of graphic card potential. However, there is always things you can do at 1440p to get more frames, but there isn't really much you can do at 1080p to get more pixels. The GPU usage is Depends on the game. If you don't play competitive games, Go with the 1440P and just dial some settings First off all in 1080p, my GPU usage is extremely low. For warzone, 100% The difference between warzone and most fps is that with the realistic environments, more complex graphics and terrain visibility makes a huge difference compared to traditional shooters like CS with simpler graphics and smaller maps Upgraded from 1080p 240hz to 1440p 165hz and never looked back Downscaling from 1440p to 1080p looks considerably worse than just native 1080p. Im currently playing at 1440p with 120hz enabled, but I'm wondering if I'm losing fps by choosing 1440p. From my understanding 1440p at 27” is the sweet spot for pixel density at that resolution. Nov 30, 2022 · To put it simply, Warzone 2 uses a dynamic resolution with temporal upscaling to 1440p on Series S, and 4K on PS5 and Series X, just like Modern Warfare 2. Just be aware that performance gets hit quite hard when you do this. I would guess that tournaments will likely default to 1080p on 24in monitors, as is pretty much standard in lots of eSports. Mar 1, 2022 · The 1080p is short for 1920x1080p which equals 2,073,600 pixels distributed all over your screen. Now in the battleroyale i get between 100 to 200 fps and sometimes it even drop below 100. 100+fps with high-ultra settings are possible in shooters like BF2042 - your CPU will be the bottleneck more than the 3060 Ti. 4 Verdict. I've tried messing around with RWC and vram settings but I'm still only getting ~110 fps average. Then landing in the benchmark spot and go through the run without getting killed otherwise having to redo it. Barely any FPS difference between 1080p and 1440p? I recently bought a new rig with 3700x + 3070, and I believe I should be getting more fps than I'm getting. 480p is brutal, 720p is blurry, 1080p is clear, and 4k looks just a little better than 1080p. 1080p high graphics settings would look better. I went half-way with a 3440x1440, oled. I’ve been a NVIDIA boy since forever, I only owned a RX580 for a secondary PC but I sold that too. If you sit closer to the recommend minim, then you should go with a higher resolution. You'll appreciate the higher resolution pretty much everywhere else. 325ppi - 325ppi (RGB equiv) - 975 subpixels per inch. CPU: Ryzen 5 3600 - 6C/12T @ 4. When you go 27 inch 1080p (81ppi) to 27 inch 1440p (108ppi) thats about a 35% increase. But I'd say the more important upgrade is from 60 to 120 fps. I’ve been playing on 1440p for the longest since it looks so crisp and my pc couldn’t push 240 on Warzone but with the implementation of dlss a few months back, I think it could push close to 240 now. At 1440 it's more of a gpu workload than cpu. You can expect +100 fps on average with the x3d on 1080p all low. The xx70 class cards tend to best suit 1440p gaming. There's a lot more pixels to drive. However when I pump it up to 1440p (1440p is 1. Both will do very well at 1080 and OK at 1440p. Rdr2 with everything on ultra, ray tracing maxed out and dlss on, and I'm still clearing 110fps. If possible return and swap it for a 32" 1440p@144+Hz, you will notice a difference. Not to mention you’ll naturally sit a little further back with 27” so the resolution will look close to 1440p@24” if you were to sit close. • 2 yr. RAM: G. you'll pay a lot for HDMI 2. it s time for 1440@240hz, hope we ll get soon 1440@360 and 4k@240hz and 1080 gets obsolete. Dirt 5 for example has a 1080p @120 but it has a horrible pop ins but none at 1440p @ 60. i mostly play fps games like apex and valorant so a higher refresh rate is more ideal than resolution, so i think it is better to just use 1080p 240hz. 33x more pixels than 1080p, and monitors can't display . iPhone 6-8. all are speaking to how the ps5 consoles can’t play at a real 4k because is up scaled, and to have the best performance they need to for 120hz for 1440 resolutions. It’s a i7 8700k with a 2080 and I usually get between 80-100 FPS in a game like warzone with medium settings. Every pro seems to be playing Warzone in 1080p 24" on 1080p monitors. This thread is full of stupid people with no clue about what they are talking about. For 1080 Ti 1440p is better unless you're talking about 240hz 1080p. Also, the difference in iq between native 4K vs dldsr 4K is much greater than 1440p on a native 1440p display vs 1440p on a 4K display. Your current set up should easily get 100+fps constant on all maps at 1080p but will probably run into drops frequently if you play on 1440p. This is the one I settled on (34GN850 is mine, this is Usually, 15-25" display at the recommended distance most users will not notice resolutions above 1080p; at 26-34", 1440p will be more ideal. A 2060 is enough for amazing 1440p performance. In 120hz mode in CoD (which you should be playing on) the game maxes out at 1440p anyway. not even on competitive i did not chose 360, i preffer better character sharpness and awareness over 1080@360. Trying to figure out which monitor would give more of a slight competitive advantage. $250 KTC H27T22 Gaming Monitor - Fast IPS Panel, 1440p, 144hz, 1ms, AMD FreeSync Premium, HDR10. For casual story mode games definitely 1440p, fps isn't as important for those but the higher resolution will make a big difference, and a 3060ti will be able to play pretty much everything at 1440p on high settings with at least 60fps. It's personal preference and varies game to game. 1 spec is there . 394ppi - 263ppi (RGB equiv) - 788 subpixels per inch. Sh0ckwaveFlash. 1440p added to all PS5 users today. of ow qi lz eq zu jv my lw sz